Selected engagement

Two Organizations. One Building. No Shared Identity Yet.

Arts & Culture NonprofitMergers & IntegrationMerger Integration Advisor + Executive Facilitator

I was brought in after the merger had legally closed but before the combined organization had any shared sense of itself. Over the course of the engagement I led listening work across staff, artists, and community members, facilitated employee-led working groups, and guided the executive team and board to a single direction the whole organization could recognize.

The turning point

They had completed the merger on paper. What they had not done, what no one had done, was decide who they were now.

Two organizations with distinct histories, loyal stakeholders, and decades of separate culture were operating under one roof and one name. The legal work was finished. The organizational work had barely started.

The turning point was not the merger itself. It was the gap between a completed transaction and a shared identity, and the fact that the gap was widening quietly while everyone stayed busy.

What was at stake

  • Two competing stories about what mattered, running side by side with no shared language to bridge them
  • Staff loyalty still attached to a predecessor organization rather than the one that now employed them
  • Community and donor confusion about what the combined organization stood for
  • A leadership team making decisions without an agreed basis for choosing between them

My role

I was brought in to help the combined organization decide who it had become, and to build a direction that the people living inside it would actually carry.

That meant serving as both advisor to the executive team and facilitator of the work itself, including the conversations that were too charged for an internal leader to run.

How I approached the work

I started with what was actually true, not the official narrative

Before any conversation about direction, I needed an honest picture of where the organization stood. I listened to employees, artists, and community members about what they were carrying into work every day. What surfaced was not chaos. It was something more specific: two different stories about what mattered.

I put the people closest to the work in the authoring seat

Rather than drafting language for staff to react to, I designed structured listening sessions and employee-led working groups. The people inside the organization already understood the turning point more clearly than the executive team had realized. My job was to give that understanding a structure it could travel through.

I asked the harder question

Not "what should we say about ourselves," but "what are we actually willing to commit to becoming?" That reframing is what moved the work from messaging to decision-making, and it is why the result was not a compromise between two cultures but something new that honored both.

I built the handoff into the design

The direction was sequenced so that each decision was carried by the group that would own it: employees authored identity language, the leadership team set priorities, and the board affirmed the strategy. Nothing arrived as a surprise.

The work

What we actually did together

  1. 01

    Listening across the combined organization

    Interviews and structured sessions with employees, artists, and community members to establish current reality.

  2. 02

    Employee-led working groups

    Facilitated groups that authored a DEIB statement in their own words rather than adopting either legacy organization's language.

  3. 03

    Identity and strategy definition

    Facilitated sessions producing mission, vision, values, and four strategic pillars with the leadership team.

  4. 04

    Board affirmation and rollout

    Carried the work to the board and supported publication and organization-wide communication.

What changed

Tangible outputs

  • An employee-authored DEIB statement
  • New mission, vision, and values
  • Four strategic pillars
  • A published and communicated strategy

Organizational shifts

  • One shared story about what the organization is for
  • Staff ownership of the direction rather than compliance with it
  • A leadership team with an agreed basis for making tradeoffs

The takeaway

A merger can be legally complete long before people experience themselves as one organization. Integration begins when leaders are willing to address the questions that structure alone cannot answer.

Cecilia Stanton Adams

Related Turning Points

Mergers & Integration

Two Companies, One Path Forward: Building Shared Services

Two enterprise insurance companies could see real efficiencies in shared HR, finance, and IT. Capturing them meant something harder than cutting a bud

Read the Engagement

Leadership & New Direction

A New President. A Community Watching. A Decade to Define.

A community college that had served its region for generations welcomed a new president. The instinct in that moment is to plan fast and announce bold

Read the Engagement

Strategy & Organizational Evolution

Relevant to Whom? Sustained by What?

A national association serving government communicators sensed the landscape shifting beneath it. There was no crisis, which made the turning point ha

Read the Engagement
All engagements

Your turning point

Facing a similar turning point?

If your organization is navigating a transition, integration, strategic shift, or alignment challenge, let's talk about what this moment requires.